Showing posts with label legaltech. Show all posts
Showing posts with label legaltech. Show all posts

Thursday, October 17, 2013

The new fall issue of Trial Reporter, MAJ's journal is now available online. Members should have received their hard copy in the mail last week. In this issue, you'll find feature articles on the topic of Auto Negligence, including:

  • Preserving and Presenting Evidence in Auto Accident Lawsuits, and Spoliation Principles, by Nathaniel Fick
  • Negotiating with Insurers, by Michael Belsky, Shaun Owens, and Mitchell Rosenweig
  • LegalTech: The Automobile Negligence Lawyer's Technology Toolbox, by John J. Cord

Plus, the following:
  • New Maryland Medicaid Subrogation Regulations, by Ron M. Landsman
  • Frequently Asked Questions: Serving Local Agencies, by Irwin Weiss
  • Assembling and Maintaining the Litigation Toolkit, by Robert Zarbin
  • Maryland's Non-Economic Cap Charts, by Robert R. Michael
  • Case Note: David v. Martinez, by Eric Stravitz
  • Appellate Watch, by Cary J. Hansel, III
  • President's Message, by Lawrence S. Greenberg

Check it out, and share it with others! Trial Reporter is one of your member benefits and one of the most well respected legal journals in the state, and country.

Tuesday, July 9, 2013

LegalTech – Technology Lessons From Federal Court

As much as most plaintiffs’ lawyers shun federal court, it has its perks.  The first is e-filing: PACER and CM/ECF are among the most efficient and user-friendly systems in use by any court.

For those lawyers who find themselves at hearings or trial in the Baltimore or Greenbelt courthouses, the second perk is immediately apparent upon entering any courtroom. These buildings are well equipped with some of the best technology.  At a recent pre-trial conference in Magistrate Judge Charles Day’s courtroom (Greenbelt courthouse), he asked the parties to schedule a technology tour with the courthouse staff so that we would be familiar with the equipment before our trial.  He also asked us to take advantage of the technology.

The advice was sound, but like most lawyers I hit a time crunch in the weeks before trial, so I never managed to get formal training on the equipment.  I would highly recommend that any lawyer filing a lawsuit in federal court make plans to visit the courthouse soon after filing, when schedules are not so tight.  Take good notes, and figure out what your options are well before you plan for trial.  What you see could impact your collection of evidence (you may opt for video depositions of fact witnesses, for example), because of your options for presentation of that evidence.  Additionally, because there are so many different types of technology, the software interface can be a little confusing.  Formal training will help you to develop a comfort with the technology that can impress the jury.

Wednesday, March 13, 2013

LegalTech – Typography, Part II (Adaptions, Style & Special Considerations)

This post is Part II of LegalTech's 2-part series on typography. Read Part I here


Simple Adaptations
Lawyers have carte blanche to change the typography of their letters, and have surprisingly few limitations for pleadings filed with the courts. Butterick makes a number of recommendations (and describes how users of Word, Wordperfect, and Mac Pages can implement those changes) to improve readability:

Font: Unless required by a court, all fonts should be proportional instead of monospaced. A monospaced font is one where every character, including the i and the m, are the same size. It was the way most typewriters worked. A proportional font conforms to the way letters are actually written, and different letters have different widths. Monospaced fonts take up more room, give lawyers fewer words per page, and are inherently harder to read. 

Most lawyers use Times New Roman for their filings. That font was designed in 1929 for the London Times newspaper, and was created to be used specifically in a newspaper’s column-format. Per Butterick:
When Times New Roman appears in a book, document, or advertisement, it connotes apathy. It says, “I submitted to the font of least resistance.” Times New Roman is not a font choice so much as the absence of a font choice, like the blackness of deep space is not a color. To look at Times New Roman is to gaze into the void. If you have a choice about using Times New Roman, please stop. Use something else. 
Other (better) font choices include Bell MT, Book Antiqua (my favorite), Californian FB, Calisto MT, Century Schoolbook, Franklin Gothic, Garamond, Gill Sans, Gill Sans MT, Goudy Old Style, Hoefler Text, Optima, and Palatino. Try them all out and use something that you like. Just not Comic Sans…. 

Spaces After Periods: This is one of Butterick’s hard-and-fast rules. He argues that two spaces after a period is a holdover from typewriter days and used to help set off sentences for monospaced fonts. The problem is that in large blocks of text, those double-spaces add up to create rivers of white space. He counsels that major publications, including books and newspapers, all use one space after periods.

Line Spacing: Line spacing is the amount of vertical space between lines. Most people use double-spaced or single-spaced lines. However, there are other options. Butterick advises that optimal line spacing is between 120% and 145% of the point size (meaning that a 12-point font should have between about 14 and 17 points of line spacing). Single-spacing is about 117%, 1.5-spacing is about 175%, and double-spacing is about 233%. Adjusting the line spacing is also better than modifying point size for shortening a document. 

Line Length: One of the major modifications that lawyers can make to their documents is to adjust the line length. This is the length from the left side of the text to the right size. Shorter lines are easier to read than longer lines, and lawyers should strive for 45 to 90 characters per line. Though font choice and point size have an impact, the best way to modify line length is to increase page margins. The default on most word processing programs is one inch per border. However, the left and right borders should be between 1.5 and 2.0 inches each. 

Using two-inch side margins is going to produce a drastically different-looking pleading than what you’re used to. When used in concert with a slightly smaller font (even 11 points), and better line spacing, the result will still be more words per page than a double-spaced, 12 point font with one-inch margins. Further, it will be a document that is easier to read. If two inches make you nervous, start with 1.5 inches on each side. 

Quotation Marks and Apostrophes: Straight quotes are commonplace, but should be shunned in favor of curly quotes. The same goes for apostrophes, which should be curly and point downward. They are more legible, and match the other characters better.

Emphasis: Another holdover from the typewriter is underlining, which was formerly the only way to emphasize text. Underlining is mechanically applied, and has no relationship to the font. Other means of emphasis, like italics and bold, are designed to harmonize with the specific font, and give a more pleasing result. 

Indentation: The first line of a new paragraph is often indented. The size of the indention should be proportional to the font. It must be at least the same as the point size, and no larger than four times the point size. With a 12-point font, the first line indent should be between 12 and 48 points, which equates to somewhere between 0.17 and 0.67 inches. The typical default tab stop on most word processing systems is 0.50 inches. Importantly, if you have extra space between paragraphs (not lines), you should not indent the first line of new paragraphs. 

Keep Text Together: Certain blocks of text need to be kept together. Headings should not be separated from the first line of text, and signature lines should not be broken up across multiple pages.

Kerning: Kerning is the amount of space between specific pairs of letters. In default mode, most word processing software places an identical amount of space between each letter. With kerning turned on, the software will change the spacing between certain letters. Font designers customize the spacing between these letter pairs, and intend for it to be used. In Word 2010, kerning can be activated by right-clicking the text, selecting Font, clicking the Advanced tab and clicking Kerning for fonts. Ideally, kerning should be turned on.

Styles 
For a lawyer to make all of these changes on a pleading-by-pleading basis would be time-consuming and likely lead to inconsistent application of the rules. The easiest way to create pleadings using your preferred typography methods is to create styles. The three major word processing programs all allow you to customize styles for easy application in your documents. 

Word users can rely on Styles to format their documents. Here is the process (you can make a new style or modify existing Word styles):
  • Click the Home tab on the Ribbon
  • In the Styles group, click the dialog launcher (that small square with an arrow at the lower right-hand side) (alternatively, hold down Ctrl-Alt-Shift-S)
  • Click the New Style button, or click an existing style to make changes
Here is the process to create a new style based on some of the recommendations in this article:
  • Name the Style (for example, Pleadings Body Text)
  • On the Style Type drop-down menu, select Linked (paragraph and character)
  • For Style for Following Paragraph, select the same style that you are creating (this will ensure that the entire document has the same styling)
  • Change the font and point size
  • Click the following boxes: Add to Quick Style list, Automatically update, and New documents based on this template
  • Click the Format drop-down menu, and select Font; click the Advanced tab
  • Click the Kerning for fonts checkbox, and select 8 for the point size. Click OK.
  • Click the Format drop-down menu, and select Paragraph
  • Spacing Before and After should be set at 0 points
  • Set the Line Spacing at Exactly 15 points (or other points that you deem reasonable)
Margins cannot be set as part of a Word Style, but you can set default margins for all Word documents. To do this, click the Page Layout tab on the Ribbon, click Margins, and select Custom Margins. Set the margins that you prefer, then click Set As Default. Clicking Yes will change the default for all new Word documents. 

Special Considerations 
The world of typography is a rabbit hole—once you start finessing your documents, you will begin trying to maximize the effect of every document. You might find yourself rethinking papers and printers, for example. Hard copy documents are usually best created with a laserjet printer over an inkjet printer, because the lines and edges are more refined. Documents which must be duplicated look better when printed directly, as opposed to making multiple copies from an original.  

For a laser printer, the best type of paper to use is smooth. Choose paper that is designed for laser printing as opposed to “copy” paper or inkjet paper. Use white paper that is as bright as you can justifiably afford. 

Conclusion
In the end, our primary job as lawyers is to advance the interests of our clients. When making typographic choices for pleadings, the primary considerations will be court rules on typography and readability. Most of the changes espoused by Butterick are small and will not be consciously noticed. A few (wider side margins, for example), will be noticed and may impair a judge’s appreciation of a pleading’s substance. Even if a pleading is created using scientifically-sound typography, a judge may not be able focus on the substance of the text when faced with a document that is non-conforming by conventional standards. Use your best judgment.

About the Author
John J. Cord (John Cord Law, LLC) graduated from the University of Colorado School of Law. He concentrates his practice on automobile negligence, medical malpractice and workers' compensation.  He provides a wide range of technological services to law firms, including blogging and trial presentation.  Find his firm on Facebook and Twitter.

Wednesday, March 6, 2013

LegalTech – Typography, Part I (Court Rules on Typography)

Typography is more than the choice of font—it is the entirety of the visual choices made when words are written down. Font is an important component, to be sure, but so is line spacing, emphasis (italics, bold and underlining), line length and the ever-important (and somewhat mystical) white space. “Good typography reinforces the goals of the text.”

Until this point, my decisions on typography have been limited by three factors: (1) the forms that have been passed down through generations of lawyers (we all use samples); (2) the habits ingrained in me by the personal preferences of schoolteachers of years past; and (3) what “felt” right. Of the three, I have come to learn, the most useful is probably my own preferences, contaminated though they might be because of the first two factors. 

Why should lawyers care? Like it or not, we are wordsmiths. Like it or not, we are publishers. Like it or not, our job is to communicate clearly and, oftentimes, to persuade. Typography will not communicate or persuade, but good typography can make a reader’s job easier.  Whether our audience is a trial judge, panel of appellate judges, client or opposing counsel, the format of the written word must not stand in the way of the substance.  

I always thought I had some typography know-how. I’ve read Edward Johnston, and for years I have absolutely refused to use Times New Roman, favoring Book Antiqua as my font of choice. My formal introduction to legal typography came recently through Matthew Butterick’s book, Typography for Lawyers, which I downloaded to my iPad. I read about the traditionally low tech of typography on the high tech of an electronic book. Butterick explained to me that I have so much room to grow, and I recommend his book to you. 

One cautionary note—there are few bright-line rules in typography. Much is dependent on the comfort level of the author, and the needs of the expected audience. Even typography’s best practices are situational. Most of Butterick’s suggestions are discreet, but a few can cause radical changes in the look of pleadings. It is up to you to decide whether a level of conformity outweighs readability. That said, clinging to “traditional” ways of doing things is simply a means to foster mediocrity. In legal writing, the only rules are those imposed by courts. 

Friday, February 8, 2013

LegalTech – Words I Never Thought I’d Say

Last week, Laura Zois and I finished a five-day jury trial in Frederick County (you can read Ron Miller’s description here).  Now I can say something that I have never said before about any case I have ever tried, from a $10,000 District Court case to a week-long jury trial:

We didn’t use a trial binder.

For me, this was big.  I am not a naturally organized person, and as you have seen from some of my posts on the topic on my own blog, I think trial organization is of the utmost importance.  There are two reasons for this. The first is perception.  The jury sees everything you do during the whole trial.  If you seem disorganized, and your trial table is messy, the jury notices.  And consciously or not, it influences them at least a little.  The second reason is practical.  A trial (especially a long one) can be unwieldy, and requires keeping track of a variety of documents, whether they are exhibits, pleadings, depositions, jury instructions, or a hundred other things. It is very important to be able to locate and use those things at a moment’s notice.

Thursday, October 25, 2012

LegalTech – Do-It-Yourself Law Firm Websites, Part II

This post is Part II of LegalTech's 2-part series on "Do-It-Yourself Law Firm Websites." Read Part I here.

Creating Your Own Website

So how do you create a new website?  If you do not need a website right now, and are simply creating one as part of your long-term plan (or back-up plan), then you do not need to pay a company thousands of dollars to do it.  This is a DIY project that is much simpler than changing a car’s oil.  The total cost can be as low as $100.00 per year.    

Choose a Domain Name  

A domain name is the website’s address.  Choosing a domain name is a largely a matter of personal preference, though it is important to comply with the Maryland Rule of Professional Conduct. Lawyers often choose names that reflect their firm name (www.johncordlaw), or specific practice areas, often combined with a geographical location (www.marylandcollisionlawyers.com).  Importantly, you can also choose different top-level domains, such as .net, .info and .org (though, .org might imply a connection with charitable organization, in violation of the MRPC).  

There are a number of services that can help you to find free domain names.  One such site is GoDaddy.com.  The home page allows users to input potential domain names to determine availability.  Several domain names are available for around $10.00 per year, and the site offers discounts with the purchase of multiple domain names.  You can purchase the name for as little as one year, or as many as ten years.  Users who intend to use the site actively should purchase the domain for the maximum amount of time, because the search engines give more credibility to sites that appear to have longevity. 

Choose a Web Host

Users can purchase domain names and hold them without doing anything with them.  When the user is ready to create a website, the next step is to select a web host.  Again, there are a variety of possibilities, but many sources of domain name purchases also provide web hosting.  GoDaddy.com offers hosting for around $5.00 to $10.00 per month.  For users who are just starting out, the smaller amount, which includes less data, is likely fine.  The web host may provide options, including Wordpress or other platform-friendly websites.  Those will help to make website creation simple, even for the novice. 

Design The Website

When a website is linked up with a platform, such as WordPress, Blogger or Typepad, the user can easily select a theme and organize the website by creating menus and adding widgets.  Widgets are applications that customize the site, and include, for example, links to other websites or blogs, an image to be used on every page, a list of recent blog posts and a search bar.  These widgets can be modified to a degree within the theme to create a unique website. 

Add Some Content

Users can create content—web pages and blog posts, though the usually simple interfaces of the platform.  When creating a basic website, users should focus on providing at least five to ten pages of content (a minimum of one page per practice area), a biography page, a home page, and a contact page.

Conclusion

To be sure, a basic, DIY website will not be particularly effective in attracting potential clients.  Remember—the goal is to create a placeholder website that can be leveraged down the road, when or if needed.  When compared to other just-created websites, these older websites will have the advantage of age.  Of course, with a little bit of work (even a few hours a month), a DIY website can grow over time and may become a tool for bringing in new work.  When the time is right, the website can be handed over to a professional website company for fine-tuning and more sophisticated design.

About the Author
John J. Cord (John Cord Law, LLC) graduated from the University of Colorado School of Law. He concentrates his practice on automobile negligence, medical malpractice and workers' compensation.  He provides a wide range of technological services to law firms, including blogging and trial presentation.  Find his firm on Facebook and Twitter. 

Tuesday, October 23, 2012

LegalTech – Do-It-Yourself Law Firm Websites, Part I

The oft-repeated phrase, “if you build it, they will come,” is simply not a realistic expectation for business.* For a lucky few, a new business or a new product can attract consumers without much fanfare.  For the rest of us, advertising and marketing are integral to success.  In this technological age, internet marketing is one useful way to find clients.

A second problem, particularly in the personal injury field of law, is the lead time required before money comes in the door.  The average small automobile collision case will not settle for at least five months, and if a lawsuit needs to be filed, it could be nine or twelve months before a resolution. Serious auto collisions and medical malpractice cases take much, much longer. 

Some attorneys manage to pay their bills by dabbling in other types of work, often criminal defense, transactional work, or family law, where the lawyer can charge hourly or flat rate fees. I knew that I didn't want to do that work, but I still wanted to find a way to at least break even in the first year and pay rent for my modest Timonium office. So I started writing web and blog content for other personal injury lawyers.

Particularly with the medical malpractice webpages, I research the internet to find out what other lawyers are writing about, both so I don’t miss anything and so I can figure out how to be stand out from the crowd.  After inputting my keywords, Google ranks what it thinks are the most pertinent results for my search terms.  As I click through them, it is quickly apparent that some high-ranking sites are dated and in even irrelevant to my searches. 

Sometimes the firms’ sites are impressive and the amount of effort put into building the sites are clear. In many cases, though, the web content is poorly written, contains very little information and was last updated five or ten years ago. How do those firms get good Google results? Perhaps they are following some of the “black hat” practices that Google is working on weeding out. But for most of them, the age of their website matters. Google and the other search engines have a higher amount of respect for websites that have been around for a while.

You've heard the proverb: “The best time to plant a tree is twenty years ago. The second best time is now.” For lawyers or law students who want to get out in the world and start a practice, join a practice or who have no idea what they will eventually do, my recommendation is simple: start a website or two. The websites don’t need to be extravagant.  It is enough in the initial stages to have a good domain name, general content (with good keywords and phrases) about whatever practice area the lawyer envisions working in, and an automatic contact form (for those who are licensed to practice).

Law students, of course, should avoid giving the impression that they are actually lawyers.  The website could be informative only—providing information about particular practice areas as the student learns through law school, clinics and jobs. 

For those who have passed the bar, any potential clients from the website can be referred to other lawyers in a manner consistent with the Rules of Professional Conduct.  The cases can be used to create a book of business that will help negotiate other jobs, salary increases or bonuses

The most important reason to do this now, however, is not the business that will come in immediately.  It is likely that there will be no business unless the website is updated on a regular basis.  Instead, the main reason is to create a website that has some longevity.  Google likes websites that have been around for a long time.  A lawyer starting at a large law firm might tire of BigLaw hours after five years, or might get downsized in the next economic meltdown.  The website could at some point be that lawyer’s lifeline to new clients and a steady stream of income. 

All things being equal, Google states that it prefers websites with better, fresher content.  However, those domains that have been around for a long time will have added “stickiness.” By being around longer, they will likely have had more clicks or links, which (in addition to age), improves the websites’ credibility in the eyes of Google. 

Check back later this week for Do-It-Yourself Law Firm Websites, Part II: Build Your Own Website!

The phrase is also a misquote. The proper quote is, “[i]f you build it, he will come.” Field of Dreams (Universal Pictures, 1989).

About the Author
John J. Cord (John Cord Law, LLC) graduated from the University of Colorado School of Law. He concentrates his practice on automobile negligence, medical malpractice and workers' compensation.  He provides a wide range of technological services to law firms, including blogging and trial presentation.  Find his firm on Facebook and Twitter.

Thursday, September 13, 2012

MAJ Launches Official Blog

If the last few weeks of posts and stories are any indication, it appears we have officially launched our first blog, Inside MAJ.

Check in daily for the latest association news and updates, as well as information essential to you and your clients, including these special features:
  • MAJ Report: Monthly columns highlighting MAJ member events and services.
  • LegalTech: Technology news relevant to you and your practice.
  • Legislative Update: Latest developments from Annapolis during the General Assembly. Coming January 2013.
  • Breaking MAJ News & Press Releases
  • Recommended Reading: Relevant blogs from around the legal and political community. Available on the right hand column. 

Want to receive Inside MAJ in your inbox or RSS feed? Both options are available on the right hand column. Also, check out the "News" tab on the MAJ website or MAJ's Facebook or Twitter pages for the latest updates.

We want to hear from you! What do you think of MAJ latest feature? 

Wednesday, August 8, 2012

LegalTech – Do-It-Yourself Trial Presentation for Under $1,200 (Part 2)

This post is Part II of LegalTech's 2-part series on "Do-It-Yourself Trial Presentation." Click here to read the Part I.

Software

Adobe Acrobat Pro X  Cost: $449.00
Acrobat Pro is essential to my practice, for so many reasons beyond trial presentations. It can easily bates-stamp documents and move pages within and between documents; it can be used to redact documents, or to type other information in.

For trial presentations, lawyers adhering to the “no bullet points” mantra will create slides that are composed mostly of evidence – medical records, pleadings, transcripts of testimony, photographs and exhibits. Many of those documents are saved in Adobe PDF form, and with Acrobat Pro they can be easily copied into a PowerPoint presentation.  Acrobat also includes some ability to recognize text within a document, and to highlight portions of the document.

Microsoft Home and Student 2010  Cost: $149.95
As useful as Acrobat Pro is, lawyers needing a cheaper alternative can use Microsoft Home and Student 2010, which provides much of the same functionality. Included in the package is PowerPoint 2010, which offers a variety of useful slide designs and templates. Most importantly, the Insert tab features a Screenshot button, which can be used to copy anything on the computer screen—including PDF documents.

The iPad Variant

iPad Cost: $499.00 to $829.00
If using an iPad, you will still need the projector, projector screen and KeynoteYou can plug the iPad directly into the projector, but being tethered to it will limit your ability to move around the courtroom, and will hurt the “coolness” factor. To display images wirelessly with an iPad, you will need the following:

MiFi device Cost: $0.00 to $80.00, plus monthly fee (approx. $80.00)
The  MiFi device creates a portable wireless network, and it links the Apple TV to the iPad. These are available from most wireless cellphone carriers for a monthly subscription. They can often be used to connect five or more devices (including cell phones, laptops and iPads) to the internet.

Apple TV Cost: $99.00
Apple TV is a small box that connects to the projector and receives wireless transmissions from the iPad.

HDMI Cable Cost: $19.00
The HDMI cable is what connects Apple TV to the projector.

Miscellaneous Supplies

Speakers Cost: $25.00
If you are planning to play audio, including depositions or deposition clips, an external speaker is mandatory (unless your projector has internal speakers).  The laptop’s speakers are usually insufficient in a courtroom setting.  Speakers are available at a variety of sizes, some only a couple of inches high.

Extension Cord/Power Strip Cost: $30.00
Every courtroom is different, and there may not be enough plugs close enough to your projector and laptop.  Get two long extension cords and one power strip, just to be safe.

Duct Tape Cost: $3.50
To avoid injury (and liability), lawyers should tape down their extensions cords to prevent trips and falls in the courtroom.

Mouse Cost: $25.00
I like to have a spare mouse, one that plugs into the computer just to avoid problems like dead batteries.

Batteries Cost: $10.00
For any devices you use (mouse, laser pointer), have some spare batteries.

Card Table Cost: $15.00
A fold-up table is important because it may not be possible to place the projector on counsel’s table.  It must be small and easy to transport.

Conclusion

There are any number of other devices, accessories and software that you can use to enhance your presentations.  A laser pointer, video recording program (Camtasia Studios), timeline software (TimeMap), and drawing software (SmartDraw), to name a few.

Any lawyer can put a presentation together using these simple tools, carry the equipment to the courthouse, and set it up.  Lawyers uncomfortable going DIY can enlist the help of a paralegal, hire a college or business students (business students are great with PowerPoint), or hire a professional.  The point, though, is that this can be done cheaply, and can enhance even a half-day automobile collision trial.

About the Author
John J. Cord (John Cord Law, LLC) graduated from the University of Colorado School of Law. He concentrates his practice on automobile negligence, medical malpractice and workers' compensation.  He provides a wide range of technological services to law firms, including blogging and trial presentation.  Find his firm on Facebook and Twitter.

Monday, August 6, 2012

LegalTech – Do-It-Yourself Trial Presentation for Under $1,200 (Part 1)

Today’s youngest jurors were born in 1994. Bill Clinton was president, Rodney King’s civil trial concluded with a verdict of $3.8 million, and Star Trek: Generations was in the theaters (the handoff movie from the original series to The Next Generation). These people are considered Generation Y or Generation Z, depending on who you talk to. The technological milestones that occurred in the next few years helped to define this generation. At age 1 the White House launched a webpage; at age 4 the search engine Google Beta was released; at age 5 MySpace came onto the scene; at age 7 the iPod and Wikipedia began their rise; at age 14 Facebook had over 100 million users; at age 16 YouTube had over 2 billion video plays per day; and in their eighteenth year there will be well over 8 trillion text messages sent.

All of this is to say that your youngest jurors are plugged in. They have grown up with smartphones, video games, blockbuster movies, and on-demand video content. They receive much of their information in visual electronic form, often preferring texts, e-mails and blogs to telephone conversations. Many of these jurors have never even read a newspaper, or thumbed a phonebook. As lawyers, we must connect with these jurors, and that means giving them information in a format that they can recognize, understand, and use. They don’t want a lecture—they want to be involved in your case.

So it’s time to turn in the easel. Here’s what you need to create a dynamic, electronic trial presentation for under twelve hundred bucks—probably less, because you may already have some of the tools.

Hardware                    

Laptop Computer  Cost: $450.00
A laptop is the storage device for presentations at trial. It will plug directly into the digital projector. The specifications of a laptop computer are beyond the scope of this article, but as with all technology, buyers should consider the purpose of the purchase. Is it going to serve as an attorney’s primary computer? Is it to be used only for presentations? What software will be downloaded onto it? Will it be compatible with software used in the office? Local computer store salespeople can provide guidance on the type of computer best suited to particular purposes.  When purchasing a new computer, be sure to find out if you can get software (like Microsoft Office 2010) included or at a discount.  Most computers will include at least a basic version of the presentation software you need, whether PowerPoint (Microsoft) or Keynote (Apple).

Projector  Cost: $350.00
The projector is the mechanism that transmits the computer’s image to the projector screen. It will plug into the computer, typically with a RGB cable or a USB cable (which will be included with the projector). It can also transmit an image from a document camera (like an modern overhead projector). Projectors range in price from $350 to about $2,000. Three good brands are Optoma, Epson and ViewSonic. Any new projector should have a minimum of 2,500 lumens (which is quickly becoming the minimum), and should be XGA (as opposed to VGA) or higher. Lumens indicate the total amount of light a bulb is capable of generating. More lumens means the jury will be able to see the presentation, even in a well-lit courtroom. XGA denotes a resolution of 1024 x 768 (whereas VGA denotes 640 x 480). Resolution is the number of individual dots used to create an image, and it is expressed as the number of horizontal picture elements (“pixels”) by the number of vertical pixels. A higher resolution indicates a better picture quality. Of less concern is the type of projector: DLP (Digital Light Processors) versus LCD (Liquid Crystal Display). As a general rule, DLP projectors are better for displaying video (i.e., deposition clips), and LCD projectors produce a sharper image.

Aspect ratio is also a consideration. It is the relationship between the width and height of an image. Most projectors have 4:3 (standard), whereas some have 16:9 (widescreen), and many are capable of both. Finally, many projectors include speakers, which can be useful if playing deposition clips.

Some modern projectors even have a USB port and are capable of displaying images and even PowerPoint presentations without a laptop computer.  Before you go this route, do consult with a technician to ensure that the projector can play any video deposition clips you might need, and PowerPoint slide animation.

Projector Screen  Cost: $100.00 to $350.00
The screen is what the jury will look at during the presentation. The main considerations in any screen purchase are size and portability. Find a screen that folds up easily for transport, and assembles easily. New models simply rise pneumatically from a tubular aluminum case to the desired height (i.e., the Draper RoadWarrior). The size of the screen will depend on the available space and layout of the courtroom, but a width of 72 to 80 inches is standard.

My preference is for a screen that uses a tripod.  These screens are easier to set up in smaller courtrooms, and can be placed at an angle in the gallery for better viewing by the judge and jury.

Coming Wednesday, August 8:
Part II – Software.

About the Author
John J. Cord (John Cord Law, LLC) graduated from the University of Colorado School of Law. He concentrates his practice on automobile negligence, medical malpractice and workers' compensation.  He provides a wide range of technological services to law firms, including blogging and trial presentation.  Find his firm on Facebook and Twitter.